Although this order was seen by some as irrational, it gave many citizens a peace of mind in regard to the war coming to their home. After Korematsu v. United States, Korematsus conviction was reversed. Back on December 7, 1941 the Japanese attacked US Naval forces in Pearl Harbor located in Hawaii. To find that the Constitution does not forbid the military measures now complained of does not carry with it approval of that which Congress and the Executive did. The Supreme court, in a 6-3 decision, upheld his conviction. What did Fred T. Korematsu do that resulted in his arrest and conviction? Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1989, 83., I chose the landmark case of Korematsu v. United States for this research paper. A citizen's presence in the locality . x3.11 Graded Assignment_ The War at Home.docx, Korematsu v. United States, 1944docx (1).docx, Intercontinental Hotels Group-21.edited.docx, majorGenderloc Female TOTAL pIbF majorGenderloc Female International Business, Britain abolishes sales tax on sanitary products In news Britain on became the, Signs of Heat Heat Detection and Timing of Insemination for Cattle Heat, To force traffic departing traffic via ANELASULUS on to transition routes, Mediterranean Diet Cookbook (AutoRecovered).edited.docx, R1-20xxxxx Email discussion #1 on remaining issues on DCI format design_v039_DCM-FL.docx, Please remember the querying questions option discussed in Unit 2 This is an, or in other words information about the shape of the deforming beam In the, Which of the following statements correctly describes the normal tonicity, NAVFAC Construction Battalion Battle Skills Guide Book 2 (Oct 05).pdf, This process of vicariance is reflected in aspects of the morphology Norup et al, o Produce efficiency benchmarks for the use of raw materials with the help of, PLEASE USE THE ABOVE SCENARIO 1. For many years the Japanese had dominated the agriculturally fertile valleys of California, causing much resentment for the local farmers, many going as far as saying the should be deported after the war. There was a need for the court to protect each citizens rights and liberties, which is not seen in the ruling. The order was used to force all Japanese Americans on the west coast of the United States into internment camps. The attack came from the Japanese, yet it caused unfounded fear in this country toward Japanese Americans. Korematsu believed there was an inconsistency with the application of both amendments because it is not fair that some amendments are applied to certain citizens in certain places when these amendments were created to protect every individual on every level. Justice Murphy found no justification for Korematsus conviction and immediately believed that his conviction should have been reversed. Conviction upheld. Executive Order 9066 resulted in the eviction of thousands of Japanese American children, women, and men from restricted areas in the West Coast and held many of them in internment camps in order of preventing the occurrence of war crimes. The difference between their innocence and his crime would result, not from anything he did, said, or thought, different than they, but only in that he was born of different racial stock. The camps, no matter how unpleasant, were turning points for both internees. Japanese Americans, although many third and forth generation citizens after Teddy Roosevelts Gentlemen's Agreement limiting the Japanese population, faced almost immediate discrimination all over the western coasts as Americans, outraged at the events of Pearl Harbor, brought their rage down upon their fellow citizens. Munsons report stated that there was no military necessity for mass incarceration of these people, yet the government ignored and kept the report, Moreover, the cases of search and seizure were required by the amendment to also be supported by the principle of probable cause. Justice Owen Josephus Roberts wrote a dissenting opinion arguing that Korematsus conviction was unconstitutional because his loyalty to the United States wasnt the reason why he was convicted. The population was largely located on the West Coast. The U.S. government had the urge to secure Americas safety, so internment camps were built to keep Japanese Americans isolated. Japanese Americans volunteered for the war, not forced to join, because these camps held no intention of harming these Japanese-Americans in the first place. Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Tech, n.d. After the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, President Franklin Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066. The majority of the court believed that compulsory exclusion of. On April 5, 1943 oral arguments were held. Write a letter to the editor of the Los Angeles Times telling which opinion in the case (majority or dissenting) you support and explain why. We are happy to assist you in case of any adjustments needed. The threat of the possibility of the presence of espionage among Japanese ancestry outweighed Japanese Americans constitutional rights because of these war time measures. Japanese-American internment violated basic human rights through racial discrimination, and in the process, subjected citizens to poor living and food conditions, emotional hardship, and financial loss, resulting in a lower standard of living and social imbalance affecting the entire race for the duration of WWII and years to come., The United States government had no right to intern Japanese Americans because of their ethnic background. . Did the Presidential Executive Order 9066 violate Korematsus 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause and his 5th Amendment rights to life, liberty, and property.? The reason Korematsu was convicted was solely due to his race. In a strongly worded dissent, Justice Robert Jackson contended: "Korematsu has been convicted of an act not commonly thought a crime," he wrote. The United States President and Congress acted in response to the attack and the political attitude of the the nations fear of war and terror. Web. This executive order required that all Japanese- Americans, some Italian- Americans, and some Jewish refugees be taken from their homes and placed in internment camps around the United States, with many being on the West Coast. Nothing better illustrates this danger than does the Courts opinion in this case. Laws, n.d. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for FRED KOREMATSU: ALL AMERICAN HERO By Anupam Chander & Madhavi Sunder **Mint** at the best online prices at eBay! Korematsu then brought forth a petition to take away his conviction due to government misconduct. S. DioGuardi Amendments 1, 4, 5, 8, 13, 14, and 15 of the United States Constitution were all violated and I will explain why in this paper., KARST, KENNETH L. Japanese American Cases Hirabayashi v. United States 320 U.S. 81 (1943) Korematsu v. United States 323 U.S. 214 (1944) Ex Parte Endo 323 U.S. 283 (1944). Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. Farewell to Manzanar, written by Jeanne Wakatsuki Houston and James D. Houston, shares the story of Jeannie Wakatsuki and how her life was changed in an internment camp in California. Our prces are pocket friendly and you can do partial payments. Yet, Justice Black justified the Courts decision by stating Korematsu was not excluded from the Military Area because of hostility to him or his race. The majority of the court believed that compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes was okay in what situation? He appealed his conviction, and his case eventually reached the Supreme Court. When that is not enough, we have a free enquiry service. was made a crime only if his parents were of Japanese birth. How was it different? The district court ruling cleared Korematsus name, but the Supreme Court decision still stands. (2 points) Imagine you are living in Los Angeles in 1944 and have just read about the case of Korematsu v. the United States. Criminal Law & Procedure Why did Black say the case was . A Nisei Order was issued which meant that all U.S. born sons and daughters of Japanese immigrants of the southern California terminal island, were ordered to evacuate their homes only bringing what they could carry. Justice Murphy states, , I dissent, therefore, from this legalization of racism. Our agents are online 24/7. . The video discussed how Korematsus kids were also impacted and how their daughter learned of this case from one of her peers as a project in class. Eventually, the case reached the Supreme Court and in a 6-3 vote they sided with the government, because they said that the potential spying and espionage was more important than Korematsus Constitutional rights. Include in your description whether it was relief, recovery, or reform, and why. When you need to elaborate something further to your writer, we provide that button. CJ2300 Assignment 1: Case Brief Our task would be simple, our duty clear, were this a case involving the imprisonment of a loyal citizen in a concentration camp because of racial prejudice. (2 points) 1. Question 4 options: That the military lacked strength because so many men were away fighting. Due to World War II, President Franklin D. Roosevelt gave permission to the confinement of tens of thousands of American citizens of Japanese ancestry and residents from Japan. This executive order gave the military the power to ban any citizen from a 50-60 mile wide coastal area from Washington State to California. This order also gave the military permission to transport these citizens to centers that they ran in California, Arizona, Washington, and Oregon. The legislation apologized and paid $20,000 to each victim in order to compensate. The book Farewell to Manzanar by Jeanne Wakatsuki Houston and James D. Houston depicts the reactions of the government and the American public toward Japanese Americans after the attack on Pearl Harbor. The order itself did not specify that Japanese Americans should be removed from military areas, but this is essentially what took place. That military powers should never be limited during war time. Despite the tension existing during the time of Korematsus conviction, after the Pearl Harbor attack, Justice Jackson didnt believe that Congress nor the Executive had the right to deprive Korematsu from his rights. He was excluded because we are at war with the Japanese Empire.because Congress, reposing its confidence in this time of war in our military leadersas inevitably it must determined that they should have the power to do just this. The decision was based off the necessary measures Congress and the Executive must make during war time. After this event occurred, the U.S decided that the japanese people of America were untrustworthy and must be put in internment camps. This order was seen in two ways. After the Bombing of Pearl Harbor President Roosevelt decided to put all Japanese-Americans in Internment Camps because he didnt trust any of them. Threat to their 5 Amendment of American citizenship called for necessary questioning of the governments role in American lives (Doc D). 80 min. What was that challenge and how did Reyna respond? The order set in motion the mass transportation and relocation of more than 120,000 Japanese people to sites the government called detention camps that were set up and occupied in about 14 weeks. . There is no suggestion that apart from the matter involved here he is not law abiding and well disposed. The dissenters disagreed. Justice Robert H. Jackson was a dissenting voice in the 6-3 decision upholding the constitutionality of the internment camps. Leonard W. Levy and Kenneth L. Karst. Was the militarys exclusion order justified? Fred Korematsu was a Japanese-American citizen who refused to relocate to one of the detention camps created during World War II by executive order specifically created to detain Japanese Americans. At the same time, however, it is essential that there be definite limits to military discretion, especially where martial law has not been declared. To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions., To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof., The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it., Constitution. Korematsu V United States -. All papers are submitted ahead of time. , Konkoly, Toni. Don't use plagiarized sources. History Matters, n.d. This site is maintained by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on behalf of the Federal Judiciary. The majority opinion ruled that the court should not address the entirety of the order under which Korematsu was convicted, which included provisions requiring citizens to report to assembly and relocation centers. Answer: (5 points) |Score | His dissent is full of examples of how Japanese Americans do not hold a threat to the nation. In 1983, a federal district court in San Francisco overruled Korematsus conviction. This exclusion of all persons of Japaneseancestry, both alien and non-alien, from the Pacific Coast area on a plea of military necessity in the absence of martial law ought not to be approved. On May 30, 1942, about six months after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the FBI arrested Korematsu for failure to report to a relocation center. Not only was Justice Murphy in discontent with the lack of constitutional rights granted to Korematsu, but Justice Murphy was upset with the treatment of all Japanese in internment camps. Regardless of the true nature of the assembly and relocation centersand we deem it unjustifiable to call them concentration camps with all the ugly connotations that term implieswe are dealing specifically with nothing but an exclusion order. After the Pearl Harbor attack, great hostility towards individuals of Japanese ancestry increased in fear of said individuals potentially being spies plotting another attack. We still see examples of inaccurate assumptions, hypocrisy, and discrimination during this time in our nations history that can be related to our own community since we continue to categorize, generalize and overreact., Assess the view that the Supreme Court was the most important branch of the federal government in assisting African Americans achieve their civil rights in the period 1865-1992, b) It is generally thought that the Negroes got what would have been due them under process of law. They did it with the rest of the country in mind. According to the first paragraph from the excerpts of the majority, opinion, what did the U.S. government believe some Japanese, Americans would do if they were allowed to remain free on the West, 3. The laws created by the government deprived Korematsu of equal protection of the law on the basis of racial discrimination. Congress in 1983 declared that the decision had been overruled in the court of history, and the Civil Liberties Act of 1988 contained a formal apology as well as provisions for monetary reparations to the Japanese Americans interned during the war. Both liberal and. Following is the case brief for Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944) Case Summary of Korematsu v. United States: President Roosevelt's Executive Order, in response to Pearl Harbor, called for the detention of American citizens of Japanese ancestry on the West Coast of the U.S. Mr. Korematsu, an American citizen of Japanese ancestry . Because the order applied only to people who were Japanese or of Japanese descent, it was subject to the most rigid scrutiny. The majority found that although the exclusion of citizens from their homes is generally an impermissible use of government authority, there is an exception where there is grave [ ] imminent danger to the public safety as long as there is a definition and close relationship between the governments actions and the prevention against espionage and sabotage. Eventually, Korematsu was caught and detained. rights regardless of ancestry or external appearances because most Americans lineage stems from foreign lands. . Since this was a camp to ensure there would not be traitors in the war, it was necessary to enforce these camps defenses. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Korematsus conviction resulting in him going to a Japanese internment camp. He was excluded because we are at war with the Japanese Empire, because the properly constituted military authorities feared an invasion of our West Coast and felt constrained to take proper security measures, because they decided that the military urgency of the situation demanded that all citizens of Japanese ancestry be segregated from the West Coast temporarily, and finally, because Congress, reposing its confidence in this time of war in our military leadersas inevitably it mustdetermined that they should have the power to do just this. This case ruling has been regarded as one of the worst Supreme Court decisions made by many historians due to the lack of civil rights granted to Korematsu. One reason was because at the time there was a lot of racism in America. On December 18, 1944, a divided Supreme Court ruled, in a 6-3 decision, that the detention was a military necessity not based on race. he was sentenced to Topaz, Utah to a five year probation along other Japanese Americans. Fred Korematsu was a native born citizen of the US, but was of Japanese heritage and he was convicted on September 8, 1942 of being in a place where Japanese werent allowed. After the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941 by Japanese military, Franklin D. Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066 on February 16, 1942. 214 Opinion of the Court. It was believed that because the Japanese had already attacked the United States, there was imminent threat of further attacks, and of espionage or. A citizens presence in the locality . There it has a generative power of its own, and all that it creates will be in its own image. . It is to say that courts must subject them to the most rigid scrutiny. The case legalizes racism By violating the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. Yet, Justice Black justified the Courts decision by stating Korematsu was not excluded from the Military Area because of hostility to him or his race. Most of the people who were relocated lived on the West Coast and two-thirds were American citizens. Volume 10 Issue 1. It was either seen as a necessary act to protect the security of the United States, or it was seen as a racist act which unethically imprisoned many American citizens and violated their constitutional rights. However, Korematsu was denied this right. . They may not reflect the current state of the law, and are not intended to provide legal advice, guidance on litigation, or commentary on any pending case or legislation. [A]ll legal restrictions which curtail the civil rights of a single racial group are immediately suspect. It is also manifest that Korematsu was convicted of an act that is not commonly a crime. The Supreme Court ruled that the evacuation order violated by Korematsu was valid, and it was not necessary to address the constitutional racial discrimination issues in this case. Furthermore, the accusation of disloyalty among Japanese Americans caused the state department to send Agent Curtis B. Munson to investigate this issue among the Japanese Americans; he concluded there is no Japanese problem on the west coasta remarkable, even extraordinary degree of loyalty among this generally suspect ethnic group (Chronology). Targeting mostly Issei and Nisei citizens, first and second generation Japanese-Americans respectively,2 the policy of internment disrupted the lives of families, resulting in a loss of personal property, emotional distress, and a personal attack on an entire race of people based solely on their ancestry. . There, the Court held that the executive order and the state laws that followed it were constitutional because they furthered a military necessity. In so doing, the Court placed national security above protection of its citizens even with regard to laws curtail[ing] the civil rights of a single racial group. The Korematsu decision was not overruled by the Supreme Court until 2018. Much is said of the danger to liberty from the Army program for deporting and detaining these citizens of Japanese extraction. Answer: (2 points) 02 May 2016. Graded Assignment Korematsu v. the United States (1944) Use the background information and the primary sources in the Graded Assignment: Primary Sources sheet to answer the following questions. This removed any Americans with Japanese ancestry from the West Coast, placing them under armed guard, otherwise known as internment camps for up to four years. What did the U.S. government believe some Japanese Americans would do if they were allowed to remain free on the West Coast? 3 Apr. The scope of their discretion must, as a matter of necessity and common sense, be wide. Congress and the Executive acted in response of the publics concern and targeted individuals of Japanese ancestry as potential war threats. Your feedback, good or bad is of great concern to us and we take it very seriously. . 1. Jan. 2003. During Congressional committee hearings, The Department of Justice representatives raised objections to the proposal. Regardless of which order Korematsu followed, he was still in violation of at least one. To calculate the final grade for this assignment, add the scores for each rubric topic for question 6 for a maximum score of 40 points. In his Argument Korematsu was not excluded because of race or hostility; He was excluded because the United States was at war with japan and there was a fear of invasion along the west coast. Get Your Custom Essay on Therefore Executive Order 9066 can not be called an atrocity for all of warfare was kept out of sight from the Internment Camps, even after letting Japanese Americans volunteer in the, The government created this order because of the chance, regardless of how big or small, that there would be disloyal Japanese-Americans in the United States aiding the enemy. 2016. Procedural History: Fred Korematsu was a Japanese- American who was sent to an internment camp following the enactment of Executive Order 9066 in 1942. Don't use plagiarized sources. 34 which, during a state of war with Japan and as a protection against espionage and sabotage, was promulgated by the Commanding General of the Western Defense . KOREMATSU v. THE UNITED STATES (1944), 165A-169A What concerns did Korematsu's arrest raise? A second executive order was issued on March 18, 1942. This also led to the death of many of the people in these camps. American History, 09 Apr. Not only has this case been regarded as one of the worst Supreme Court decisions, but it also has served as a model of a ruling that shouldnt be repeated. Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court. Korematsu v. United States. However, there was an exception for the Japanese-Americans to get out of the Camps and it was by volunteering for the war. Bad is of great concern to US and we take it very seriously Bombing Pearl... Citizens from their homes was okay in what situation, he was still in violation of at least.! Itself did not specify that Japanese Americans on the West Coast and two-thirds were American citizens in... In internment camps in favor of Korematsus conviction and immediately believed that compulsory exclusion of large groups citizens... Of which order Korematsu followed, he was sentenced to Topaz, Utah to Japanese... Which is not law abiding and well disposed Korematsu then brought forth petition. Legal restrictions which curtail the civil rights of a single racial group are immediately suspect conviction should have been.! This executive order gave the military the power to ban any citizen from a 50-60 wide. Further to your writer, we provide that button Murphy States, Korematsus.... Apart from the Japanese, yet it caused unfounded fear in this country toward Americans... Points ) 02 May 2016 or reform, and his case eventually reached the Supreme.... Racism by violating the equal protection of the United States ( 1944 ), 165A-169A what concerns did &. Decision, upheld his conviction, and Why make during war time measures http: //constitution.laws.com/supreme-court-decisions/korematsu-v-united-states >,,... Upholding the constitutionality of the presence of espionage among Japanese ancestry outweighed Japanese Americans constitutional rights because these! Or reform, and Why fear in this case allowed to remain free on the West?! An exception for the war, it was by volunteering for the held... 14Th Amendment conviction and immediately believed that his conviction of citizens from their was. But this is essentially what took place the Japanese people of America were untrustworthy and must be in! Must make during war time measures and conviction on the West Coast and two-thirds were citizens... The country in mind camps defenses Japanese people of America were untrustworthy and must be in! Group are immediately suspect graded assignment korematsu v the united states (1944) writer, we have a free enquiry.! Representatives raised objections to the most rigid scrutiny necessary questioning of the court held that the the. Was okay in what situation manifest that Korematsu was convicted was solely due to his.! ( 2 points ) 02 May 2016 legalization of racism in America followed, he was still in violation at. Conviction, and his case eventually reached the Supreme court decision still stands the decision not... Solely due to government misconduct restrictions which curtail the civil rights of a single racial are. The power to ban any citizen from a 50-60 mile wide coastal area Washington... Are pocket friendly and you can do partial payments is of great concern US... Make during war time measures military the power to ban any citizen from a mile... Powers should never be limited during war time did Fred T. Korematsu do resulted... Citizens of Japanese descent, it was by volunteering for the court that. Are happy to assist you in case of any adjustments needed military powers should never be limited during war.... Located on the West Coast of the camps, no matter how,... There was a need for the Japanese-Americans to get out of the 14th Amendment Japanese camp. Forces in Pearl Harbor located in Hawaii and you can do partial payments that Korematsu convicted! With the rest of the U.S. government believe some Japanese Americans constitutional rights because of war... Black say the case legalizes racism by violating the equal protection clause of the internment camps: ( 2 )... Was sentenced to Topaz, Utah to a five year probation along Japanese! Yet it caused unfounded fear in this case also led to the death of many of the Judiciary! Will be in its own image the court believed that compulsory exclusion of didnt. Lived on the West Coast and two-thirds were American citizens legalization of racism danger than does the opinion. The power to ban any citizen from a 50-60 mile wide coastal area from Washington State to California overruled the! Enquiry service citizen & # x27 ; s arrest raise 1983, a Federal district court ruling Korematsus... Are pocket friendly and you can do partial payments that it creates will be in its image... Not be traitors in the ruling was issued on March 18, 1942 camps and it relief! Of citizens from their homes was okay in what situation military powers should never be limited during time. The equal protection of the internment camps because he didnt trust any them! President Roosevelt decided to put all Japanese-Americans in internment camps because he trust... Program for deporting and detaining these citizens of Japanese descent, it was by volunteering for the held. Or reform, and all that it creates will be in its own and! Office of the governments role in American lives ( Doc D ) the district court ruling cleared Korematsus name but. Happy to assist you in case of any adjustments needed event occurred, the decided... Put all Japanese-Americans in internment camps this is essentially what took place manifest that Korematsu was convicted of act... Is no suggestion that apart from the Army program for deporting and detaining these citizens Japanese... Ruled in favor of Korematsus conviction enquiry service a Federal district court San... Solely due to government misconduct built to keep Japanese Americans should be from... The government deprived Korematsu of equal protection clause of the court to each... Of an act that is not enough, we provide that button criminal law & Why... Behalf of the court held that the executive acted in response of the possibility of governments. There it has a generative power of its own image which order followed..., he was sentenced to Topaz, Utah to a five year probation along other Americans. 7, 1941 the Japanese people of America were untrustworthy and must be put in internment because! Were constitutional because they furthered a military necessity possibility of the 14th.. Racial group are immediately suspect 50-60 mile wide coastal area from Washington State to California arguments were held lacked! ( Doc D ), so internment camps danger than does the Courts opinion this! 20,000 to each victim in order to compensate assist you in case of any adjustments needed outweighed Japanese Americans do. Was convicted of an act that is not commonly a crime, 165A-169A concerns. Nothing better illustrates this danger than does the Courts opinion in this case both internees be in its,! On December 7, 1941 the Japanese people of America were untrustworthy and must be put in camps. Not law abiding and well disposed Coast of the governments role in American lives ( Doc D ) that was! ] ll legal restrictions which curtail the civil rights of a single racial are... What did the U.S. Courts on behalf of the court believed that his conviction should have been.! Clause of the camps and it was relief, recovery, or,! When that is not enough, we have a free enquiry service, I dissent, therefore, from legalization... Court decision still stands conviction, and Why something further to your writer, we have a free enquiry.. Challenge and how did Reyna respond that it creates will be in its own, and his eventually... You in case of any adjustments needed danger to liberty from the Japanese attacked US Naval forces in Pearl located... Congressional committee hearings, the court to protect each citizens rights and liberties which. The legislation apologized and paid $ 20,000 to each victim in order to compensate he not. And detaining these citizens of Japanese extraction dissent, therefore, from this of. That button was subject to the proposal order gave the military the power to ban any citizen from a mile. Because so many men were away fighting 02 May 2016 the threat of the people in these camps Procedure did. Japanese-Americans in internment camps he appealed his conviction should have been reversed x27 ; t use plagiarized.. Army program for deporting and detaining these citizens of Japanese birth each victim in order to compensate Naval... Not specify that Japanese Americans on the West Coast not seen in the war ruled... For both internees for both internees a dissenting voice in the ruling Americans isolated court cleared... Recovery, or reform, and Why ( 1944 ), 165A-169A what concerns did Korematsu & # ;! Gave the military the power to ban any citizen from a 50-60 mile wide coastal area from Washington State California. Conviction resulting in him going to a five year probation along other Japanese Americans isolated but this is what! Topaz, Utah to a five year probation along other Japanese Americans war threats favor of Korematsus and... Japanese or of Japanese birth conviction was reversed secure Americas safety, so internment camps volunteering for the to! After this event occurred, the U.S decided that the military lacked strength because many. Court believed that his conviction, and all that it creates will be in its own image of... Descent, it was by volunteering for the Japanese-Americans to get out of the United States into internment camps believed... Constitutionality of the publics concern and targeted individuals of Japanese birth toward Japanese Americans groups of citizens their! Japanese ancestry as potential war threats only to people who were Japanese or of Japanese birth the reason was! Matter how unpleasant, were turning points for both internees: that the executive was! It were constitutional because they furthered a military necessity, he was sentenced to Topaz Utah. This also led to the most rigid scrutiny, Utah to a Japanese internment camp we are happy assist... Are happy to assist you in case of any adjustments needed Korematsu #.